Tarnished wth the same brush

for discussing science, relationships, religion or non-BK spirituality.
Post Reply
User avatar
john
Reforming BK
Posts: 1606
Joined: 03 May 2006
Affinity to the BKWSU: ex-BK
Location: UK

Tarnished wth the same brush

Post by john »

The following article is reprinted from HINDUISM TODAY, September 1991:

WESTERN PSYCHIATRISTS APOLOGIZE TO Hindu PEERS

The American Psychiatric Association (APA) published a report in 1989 labelling the Hare Krishnas as destructive cultists and loosely linked Hundu swamis to Satan worship.
APA member Dr. Deen Chandora--a Hindu psychiatrist but not a Hare Krishna member--saw the remarks as gross untruths and felt they had slandered his faith. Steaming a little under his otherwise professionally cool, Advaitic collar, he figured, "If we don't stand up for what is true, we are not doing our social duty." Dr. Chandora then proceeded to rally together a band of prestigious Hindu psychiatrist colleagues to set religious records straight. He succeeded. Two years later the APA graciously submitted a ful apology and promised to be more sensitive in the future. Here is the story in Dr. Chandora's own words:

"In the late 1980's, there were article appearing in psychiatric journals like the Psychiatric Times accusing various religious groups, in particular the Hare Krishnas, of being *destructive cults, aligning them with the [Christian] cult of Jim Jones. I felt this was a misrepresentation. So I wrote a letter to the editior to correct it. I explained that Hare Krishna has been known in India long before it was introduced to America. It belongs to the Chaitanya school of Vaishnavism and Mahatma Gandhi was one of the greatest Vaishnavs. When i was a child, I used to go with my grandmother to the Hare Krishna temples. Those are the temples of Vallabacharya in Rajasthan. There is no essential difference between the Vallabacharya and Chaitanya sect of Hare Krishnsas. But the editor did not publish the letter until a year later and still there were psychiatrists who insisted in calling them a cult.

"Then I attended the World Congress of Psychiatry in Athens in 1989 and reiterated that the Hare Krishns represent authentic Vaishnav practices that have been around for thousands of years. They are not robots and zombies, but practicing Bhakti yogis. "Then I got in touch with Dr. Prakash Desai, professor of Psychiatry at the V.A. Medical Center of Chicago and Dr. Velandy Manohar, President of the Indo-Psychiatry Association in Connecticut, and wrote a two-page petition to correct the various misrepresentations about Hinduism in APA writings. Along with several eminent colleagues, I presented it to the president of the American Psychiatry Association, Dr. Elisse Benedek, at a meeting in New York City in 1990. I quote briefly from it:

Many of the authors included in the APA's tack force report [on cults] are mainstream religious ministers. This contributes to the report's dangerously one-sided views. we find a distorted perception of other religions of the world and a neglect of a fundamental sociological principle: that one culture cannot be judged by the standards of another. In the great melting-pot of America, where freedom is so dearly cherished, we ask that the APA withdraw the task force report, or at least modify it so as not the denigrate Hindu, Buddhist and Zen philosophies by gratuitously labeling them as "cults." Partly as a result of violence against immigrant Hindus in the Northeastern United States, our nation last month passes public law #101-275, known as the "hate crimes" Bill. The purpose of this law is to deter violence against individuals or groups who "look different" or think differently from established norms. We feel the APA must suport the spirit of this new law. "

Dr. Benedek said to us, 'Why not present a workshop on this whole area.' So we did. On May 14, 1991, New Orleans, we conducted a workshop, 'Indian Religions are not Cults,' ath the 144th Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Assoication. Over 100 people attended. It was extremely successful and corrected much misinformation and educated in a positive way." [end of HINDUISM TODAY article]

Some notes on the above: (1) Don't confuse the American Psychiatric Association (mentioned above) with the American Psychological Association. The latter has a much better record of respect for the dignity of minority religions. (2) This may be a serious set back for the deprogrammers, who have committed themselves to a strategy of portraying minority religions (what they call "cults") as epidemics of deliberately induced mental illness (what they call "mind-control"). The APsychologicalA rejected this pseudo-science years ago, but the APsychiatricA had been swallowing the deprogrammers' line about "destructive cults." Since the deprogrammers and their apologists (CAN, etc.) make no distinction between the Krishnas and other minority religions *(CAN founder Ted Patrick was fond of saying "There's not a brown penny's worth of difference between any of them"), this victory for Hinduism is a victory for all minority faiths.
*Note this was before Scientologists took over CAN in 1996. As far as I am aware Cult Awareness programs started after the Jim Jones cult incident, which incidently was a Christian cult.
User avatar
fluffy bunny
ex-BKWSU
Posts: 5365
Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Affinity to the BKWSU: ex-BK
Please give a short description of your interest in joining this forum.: ex-BK. Interested in historical revisionism, failed predictions and abuse within the BK movement.

Re: Tarnished wth the same brush

Post by fluffy bunny »

john wrote:Those are the temples of Vallabacharya in Rajasthan. There is no essential difference between the Vallabacharya and Chaitanya sect of Hare Krishnsas. But the editor did not publish the letter until a year later and still there were psychiatrists who insisted in calling them a cult.
Quick foot note.

Vallabacharya Sect was the same primary Hindu sect that Lekhraj Kirpalani was part of.

I have no problem with the Hare Krishnas, or their spin off groups, and hung out with them. In comparison to straight society, I would probably find them more preferably. But I do think they are/were/became a cult as well. It is relative and I will try and explain at some later date when I have the time.

The guru within the Hare Krishnas that would have been my spiritual leader got his head cut off by one of his devotee after he dropped out a bit, started taking acid again (the original mostly were hippies) and sleeping with female devotees. His name was Tirthapada. There were the usual repeated child abuse incidents and a bit of financial intrigue. Even in the UK, apart from the manor house George Harrison gave them there are big properties in North London and big cars. They too exploited the indigenous Hindu population of the West being first on the scene with some deities.

So it does appear what makes a "cult" is not just the concept, tradition or the leadership but the context and individuals within it as well. To me there appears to be layers of disassociation from reality that occur that turn what is truth into a Disney version of truth very quickly. I have not analysed why and how it happens. I suspect it is happening to the BKWSU. Money and success (status) are obviously two contributors.
User avatar
john
Reforming BK
Posts: 1606
Joined: 03 May 2006
Affinity to the BKWSU: ex-BK
Location: UK

Post by john »

I used to go to some Hare Krishna meetings, the hours of chanting, singing and drumming before the grub finally came eventually wore me down :lol:

But seriously, as well as looking at cults or more specifically BKs as a cult, we should have an objective look at the area of cult awareness networks; why they came about, who sponsored them, how corrupt did they become. How, what they say has crept into the language of modern society; 'cult' 'brainwash' 'mind control'.

Something I learnt whilst looking at the Scientology stuff is that the APA (I believe it was them) set out to discredit them and so ensued the infowars and battle between Scientologists and Psychiatry. If you listen to any Scientologist, say for example Tom Cruise, its like he is on a crusade to discredit psychiatry.

I believe if we really want to know what is going on we have to look beyond the media and the front pages of websites. Of course, most people won't be interested to do that and that is where the power of words like 'cult' and 'brainwash' come into play.

Is today's Western society the biggest brainwashed cult ever?
User avatar
abrahma kumar
Friends and family of
Posts: 1133
Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Affinity to the BKWSU: ex-BK
Contact:

Post by abrahma kumar »

john wrote:I believe if we really want to know what is going on we have to look beyond the media and the front pages of websites. Of course, most people won't be interested to do that and that is where the power of words like 'cult' and 'brainwash' come into play. Is today's Western society the biggest brainwashed cult ever?
Very good question. And this is one of the reasons why I have to be very cautious about writing-off the BKs on the basis of somebody else's or some other organisation's view or experience of them.

It is all very much an exercise in on-going learning. Thanks for expressing this view.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests