andrey wrote:In the Bible it is said that God named animals and birds and we now know there are human souls who play part like fish or crocodile.
And so when the animals come into Noah's Ark "two by two" are they talking about the king and queen souls of each human species? It works as a metaphorical concept.
I was reading
VCD No.287, Audio Cassette No.771, Dated 5.9.05, Nilanga and enjoyed it. it is an interesting comparison to the open sewer of accusations that the Vishnu Party attempted to present about Virendra Dev Dixit.
To be honest, I do not really care about media reports, bogus accusations of tax fraud or even if had consensual sex with someone. The tax system is complex and corrupt and open bribery, people make mistakes and it run contrary to Knolwedge. The media is even moreso as they make money and power out of selling filth, the have a need for filth and will produce it for themselves even if it does not exist. Consensual sex ... it happens, it is all part of growing up. My only concern would be if there had been any abuse of power involved but I have seen nor heard any evidence of that and heard witness to the contrary that the Vishnu Party leader was involved in bribery. I do not know this to be true yet but would have to ask the question to all parties before I allowed it to enter my head.
But ... on a metaphorical level what Virendra Dev Dixit, or Baba via Virendra Dev Dixit if you wish, is good thinking. You would be able to apply it fairly universally to all of life. It uses metaphors and stereotypes that are universal and this is good evidence of truth. If thought can be taken and applied and fit pretty much everywhere, then you know that it is close to being truth.
Truth, in my opinion, stands apart from any individual or personality. It is not subjective. Anyone that attempts to subjectify it, where to own it or to attack it. Truth could exist in a Nazi just as easily in a Saint, as too the opposite.
In PBK terms, I probably converted to the Bauddhivanshis because there are many concepts left in Buddhism that are very attractive. One of them is "
The Great Ball of Merit", the idea that truth or goodness is contributed to by all and should be appreciate as such. It comes up in the 2,000 year old As?asahasrika Prajnaparamita Sutra.
Buddhism, not the religion but the "Yoga of the Intellect", is such a relief from the hoodoo voodoo of Hinduism. Most Indians within the extended BK family, in which I include PBKs, make the mistake of thinking that because someone is white they are therefore a Christian soul. It is laughably, primitively, body-consciousness.
I would go as far to say that some of the highest thinking Bauddhivanshis are in the West and that many Suryavanshi have attempted to recreate a balance combining the positive virtues of Buddhism and Christianity, i.e. the heart and the intellect. I would say that many Westerners also attempt to refer back to Suryavanshi consciousness when they talk about and relate to Taoism and it saddens and disappoints me when the alleged Supreme Soul does not reference the minority religions that have created a whole lot less trouble on the planet, e.g. Toaism, Zoroastrianism, Jain, even Buddhism is a tiny minority within India (may be less than 1%).
If the PBKs wish to speak to the world they should emphasise the word "metaphorical". It appears to me as an outsider that you are trying to understand the metaphorical not literally meaning of BY Knowledge and expand your thinking to see the metaphorical meanings of all or any literature. There is no fault in that.
Anyone that is attempting to do good and reach higher, however gifted or faulted they are as a person, will almost
have to come into conflict and controversy with worldly authority. It is inevitable and unavoidable, in my opinion on the basis of historical examples, as worldly power is corrupt and suppressive. Any organization that co-exists well with worldly power and authority has almost guaranteedly got to be of the same nature. "Birds of a feather flock together."
One question for whoever walks this way, why has BapDada spoken so little about Buddha and so much in comparison about Christ when Christ is the lesser soul by a few degrees? And why is Abraham the greater soul than Buddha?
I do not want the pea brain answers, I know them. I want the in depth answers if it is a question worth answering. Personal, I think the entire Abrahmic tradition through the Jews, to the Christians to Islam stinks of blood lust from the very beginning to the end. They have always lent towards the outside world by the sword even putting to death their own mystics, whereas the Eastern traditions (not Hinduism which is the center) have withdrawn and looked within.