# Error No. 39) Another CLEAR evidence - PROVING that PBKs are DEFINITELY ATTRACTED to FALSEHOOD, rather than to the Truth:-
1) In the PBK site - main page -
http://www.adhyatmik-university.com/sac ... khand.aspx - (4th topic from top, regarding Shankar - 11th point from top) they have written as -
"ऐसी कोई बात है
नहीं शंकर-पार्वती है ही नहीं। यह तो स्थूलवतन है।" (मु.8.5.70 पृ.2 आदि)
= "Aisee koyi baath hai
naheen Shankar Parvati hai hee naheen. Yah toh sthool vatan hai." which then leads to the meaning- = "It is not that Shankar and Parvati are not there at all. This is the corporeal World."
But, there is a
full stop, between the words "naheen" and "Shankar". -
http://www.adhyatmik-university.com/Web ... -05-70.pdf
Irony is- PBKs THEMSELVES have given the proof in the scanned copy of the original Murli. But, they have interpreted same in an opposite way, by DELIBERATELY & INTENTIONALLY MISAPPROPRIATING same, by OMITTING the FULL-STOP, ALTOGETHER, to ALTER the MEANING COMPLETELY. - :laugh:
Read the adjacent sentences - SM 8-5-70(2):- Likh do yah amarnaath ki jhooti yaatra hai. Aisee koyi baath hai
naheen(.) Shankar Parvati hai hee naheen. Yah toh sthool vatan hai. Vahaan phir Shankar parvati yugal kaise ho saktey hain. Shankar ko parvati kahaan se aayi, jo unko baith kathaa sunaayi. Toh likhnaa chahiye yah sabhee hai 100% jhoot. Shankar ne parvati ko kathaa sunaayi, yah wrong hai."
= Write down that this pilgrimage of Amarnath is FALSE. There is NO SUCH aspect (
in REALITY). There is NO Parvati with Shankar, AT ALL (
THERE, in the Subtle Region)! This is the corporeal world. How can Shankar be a 'yugal' of Parvati THERE (
in the Subtle Region)! Where would Parvati come to Shankar, that he would sit and relate the Story to her (
THERE, in the Subtle Region)? (
This DOES NOT INFER, EITHER, that since Shankar CANNOT relate the Story of Immortality to Parvati in the Subtle Region, so he comes down to this corporeal sphere, in an impure corporeal body, and relates the Story to Parvati, HERE - as ERRONEOUSLY INFERRED by MAHA-MURKH -Virendra Dev Dixit, and BLINDLY ACCEPTED by the equally MAHA-MURKH PBKs)! So you should write that ALL THESE ASPECTS are
ONE HUNDRED PER CENT FALSE! It is WRONG to say that Shankar related the Story to Parvati. (
Because Shankar NEVER comes on this corporeal sphere, inside ANY impure corporeal body, to be able to relate the Story of Immortality to ANY Parvati, HERE;
and NO SUCH Story can be related, THERE, in the Subtle Region, where REAL Shankar ALWAYS resides, during the Confluence Age.
Hence Shankar can NEITHER relate the Story of Immortality to Parvati, THERE, in the Subtle Region, NOR can Shankar relate the Story of Immortality to Parvati, HERE, on this corporeal sphere. It is ACTUALLY, ONLY ONE REAL ShivBaba, Shiva or God, who relates the Story of Immortality to ALL REAL Parvatis or the Righteous Children, THROUGH Brahma Baba, who is the REAL PrajaPita, or the REAL Father of Humanity -
while Virendra Dev Dixit is a COMPLETE IMPOSTOR, making COMPLETE IDIOTS out of the BLIND, INNOCENT/IGNORANT/ARROGANT PBKs -
ALL, PERFECTLY, AS PER DRAMA PLAN, OF COURSE -
NOTHING NEW)!
It is ALSO to be noted that they have tried to ALTER the meaning of the last sentence, by interchanging the Hindi word 'ne' (meant for Shankar), and the Hindi word 'ko' (meant for Parvati) - by ATTEMPTING to cancel, re-write and erase the original words in the Murli, in order to make it appear more logical to their theory, viz.,
"
Shankar ne Parvati ko kathaa sunaayi, yah wrong hai." -
It is WRONG to say that Shankar related the Story to Parvati.
This goes COMPLETELY AGAINST their theory!
"
Shankar ko Parvati ne kathaa sunaayi, yah wrong hai." -
It is WRONG to say that Parvati related the Story to Shankar.
They tried to alter the meaning by interchanging the words, but later on someone else has made a COMPLETE HASH of it, and so they were unsuccessful; but it is still obvious to the SHARP, Divine Eye!
2) This is another proof that PBKs deliberately/INTENTIONALLY/SPITEFULLY commit BLUNDERS to defend their DOWNRIGHT LIES!
This blunder is true as on date. In future, PBKs may correct. Let us hope.
3)
Extra:-
PBKs usually take reference from scriptures to prove their claims - when they fail to explain the Murlis points. In scriptures it is shown Shankar relating story to Parvati. But, practically, the PBK Shankar is far away from their Parvati (sister Vedanti). So- no amar kathaa at all! And- the ACTUAL FACT is that it was BK Parvati (who is Chandravanshi, according to PBKs) who gave (at least
basic knowledge- "in their view")
amar kathaa to PBK Shankar (who is Suryavanshi, according to PBKs), in 1969, at Palri Centre, in Ahmedabad.
From the above, it becomes VERY CLEAR, that the BLIND, unsuspecting PBKs are TREACHEROUSLY TRICKED into studying the so-called advanced knowledge, which is NOTHING but the 'shooting' of the FALSEHOOD of Ravan Rajya, by giving GREAT AUTHENTICITY to same, by simply including innumerable points from the ORIGINAL SMs & AVs, by either ALTERING/MODIFYING them or TOTALLY MISINTERPRETING them, in the OPPOSITE sense, from the TRUE intention of REAL ShivBaba, Shiva or God!
The GREAT MAJORITY of the INNOCENT/IGNORANT PBKs are TOTALLY UNAWARE of these BLATANT VIOLATIONS of Shrimat, on the part of their bodily guru Virendra Dev Dixit, as well as by AIVV, as an Organization, and EVEN AFTER same are CLEARLY pointed out to some of them, they REFUSE to ACCEPT same, owing to their RANK ARROGANCE of ABJECT body-consciousness!
