The differences between you and I. button slammer, is that
a) I won't lower myself to discuss things in that manner, and
b) I know what I am talking about, and can endlessly document the reality of situations.
I don't need to depend on slurs, or false personal attacks in public.
warrior wrote:Can’t you help us here? Maybe give a hand to Shivsenabhai or allow someone else to join in to help sorting the layout of this forum. It is confusing in here.
I would if I could but I am afraid that I don't know the subject area well enough.
Discussion forums are difficult to manage. It would be far better to hand it over some entirely neutral third party to run, a fair referee to do their best but that wont happen, so what other options exist?
I always found Arjun to be entirely equanimous and accommodating and despite have the power to do what he wanted at bkinfo, he never once did or abuse it. Neither did Bansy or others. Yes, delegating moderatorship to specific forums in possible. Often the BEST thing to do with a problematic person is give them some responsibility.
Although I don't follow the path of 'Advanced Knowledge', it was always clear that Shivsena was both raising entirely valid anomalies or paradoxes ... AND pushing his own version which he felt was correct. Purely from a logical perspective, I thought many of the controversies he raised were valid and I found many of the answers from Virendra Dev Dixit disappointing. I think Virendra Dev Dixit has an interesting part in the history of the Yagya but I was left feeling it only went so far.
Having said all that ... I would trust Shivsena to do something if he said he would and if he has said he is limiting himself, I would guess he will.
I see you got your history forum now. I think you guys and sisters could do great service by attempting to sort it all out and document the history of the AIVV/PBK which has not been done (at least in English). If it is done, perhaps some academics etc - and questioning BKs - will pick up on it too. Better to work together rather than against each other.
It is probably better to work together on something rather than argue theoretically over irresolvable issues. Statements of faith are irresolvable because they are based on faith. Only time will tell who was right. You should all work together to show a better example to the BKs, and put a better face on AK for the rest world.
What terrible things has Shivsena done as admin?
I found Andrey's to be like that of a hammer and a little bit too idealistic at times ... but I appreciate the value of him having some social support from other BKs or PBKs. I always thought what he lack was sufficient contact with others. Technically, if he was being an irritation, the boss could limit his access to one or two general forums only .. he could even have his own sub-forum where he could voice his opinions and others could go to speak with him if they wished. It is all possible.
Folks have to accept that discussion forums are not perfect, have some limitations according to their design ... and that it is very easy for obsessive individuals to spoil them. It seems to be some problem inherent with computers, the internet and perhaps the kind of people that use them rather than go down the shops or center for a natter.
To me, it looks like the new forum design is true ... one forum does seem to support AK, the other question is? In simple terms, what is the problem?