shivsena wrote:
The point about prajapita Brahma you have quoted is from Gita khand or Gita pocket and i am sure that you do not have the Sakar Murli....this point needs to be confirmed from Murlis as it raises many queries and ambiguites.
well for your kind information.....Gita KHAND and Gita POCKET is an outcome of complete truth and hence everything is kept transparent....about the Murli i am trying to find the same,if you have the one you can also search for it....will post once i get.....till then you can refer some below Murli....
There is a Murli point which says: "ShivBaba hai swarg ka rachieta" (meaning : ''ShivBaba is creator of heaven'']...and also a Murli point says: "ShivBaba hai mukhya actor-director-creator.".....so if prajapita Brahma is also a creator, then question arises what does He create and who is his creation(Does prajapita Brahma create heaven?????) ....also how can there be 2 creators and 2 creations ??????????
"Prajapita hai toh saari praja hui na.Great great grandfather hai.Yah saara gyaan abhi tum bachchon ki buddhi mein abhi hai.Prajapita Brahma kehte toh bahut hai,parantu yatharth reeti jaante nahiBrahma kiska bachcha hai.Tum kahenge Parampita Parmatma SHIV ne inko adopt kiya hai.Yah toh sharirdhari hai na.Eeshwar ke aulaad sabhi atmayein hai.Phir sharir milta hai toh Prajapita Brahma adoption kehte hai.Yah adoption nahi hai.Atmaon ko parampita parmatma ne adopt kiya.Nahi.Tumko adopt kiya hai.Tum ho Brahmakumar-kumariyan.ShivBaba adopt nahi karte hai.Sabhi atmayein anaadi-avinashi hai."---------MU 6.1.69(morning class)
...yatharth reeti se nahi jaante.....PRAJAPITA ko....what you are having is misconception about him....
ShivBaba doesn't adopt us...we are adopted by PRAJAPITA BRAHMA and hence he is our creator and we are his creation....
we all are souls and from soul point of view no one can creates us,that is why the last sentence has been mentioned as atma being anaadi and avinashi.....anaadi means one who is not created.....adoption takes place only in corporeal form....
"Prajapita Brahma hai toh praja bhi hongi na.Prajapita Brahma dwaara SWARG ki STHAAPNA."------MU 2.1.69 (Night class)
....no need to mention anything here....
"Saari duniya ke manushya BAAP ko bhi maanenge Brahma ko bhi maanenge.Apan ko rooh(atma) samjhenge toh BAAP ko maanenge.Phir manushya sharir mein aate hai toh BRAHMA ko baap maanenge.BRAHMA ko hi PRAJAPITA kaha jaata hai.Atmaon ko toh praja nahi kahenge.Manushya srushti kaun rachte hai PRAJAPITA BRAHMA ka naam aata hai toh vah SAAKAAR vah NIRAKAAR ho gaya.Vah toh anaadi hai.Vah bhi anaadi kahenge.Dono ka naam highest hai.Vah ruhaani baap vah PRAJAPITA.Dono baith tumko padhate hai.Kitna highest hua.Bachchon ko kitna nasha chadna chahiye.Parantu itna nasha chadta nahi hai.Khushi kitni honi chahiye.Parantu Maya khushi mein rehne nahi deti hai."
....there are two points SHIV and PRAJAPITA....whole world will believe both.....and not only one of them....that is from soul point of view they will come to know about SHIV and since they are in corporeal form they will come to know about BRAHMA and that is PRAJAPITA BRAHMA....
only souls are not called as praja...souls in corporeal form are called as PRAJA and since we are manushya...we are having PRAJAPITA as Father of manushya srushti(world of human beings)...
and most important both SHIV and PRAJAPITA are anaadi...hence both are creators with SHIV as incorporeal form and PRAJAPITA as corporeal form....both are having name highest.....now how would you describe this.....English grammar....ironically both cannot be called highest(as a term of comparison),but they are called so,why?....because they share same physical body....this is the only single term that satisfies the highest named concept....
hence SHIV+PRAJAPITA==highest.....now they can be called so....
and most important thing is that both are teaching us.....now how this can be explained?
similarly it can be explained on path of how highest named concept got cleared.....SHIV cannot teach us without any body...so we are taught by SHIV through PRAJAPITA,hence both are there for teaching....
Now instead of feeling full and satisfied,these concepts are ignored by some of the children,thanx to Maya.....this is what has been warned....!!!
now coming to your point....SHIV is neither actor,nor creator and not a director,directly.....you are smart enough to understand that SHIV doesn't teach or give any directions through prerna.....he has to do it practical
instead to lead these roles he need a corporeal media,hence SHIV+BABA together is(are) called actor, creator and director....
Also if prajapita Brahma is creator, then how can the same soul be Bharat (who receives inheritance from ShivBaba). A soul cannot be both creator and creation at the same time. So a long list of queries will arise if there are two creators.
when we say nimitt....we automatically bring that person to second place....of course when a person is nimitt,he is not the one responsible.....here also Bharat is nimitt for doing the work of SHIV or in simple sentence SHIV does work through Bharat.....so SHIV is the one prior to Bharat and it is SHIV whose entry had given Bharat the utmost importance.... from this point of view....Bharat became Bharat only because of entry of SHIV...so SHIV is reason for the birth of role of Bharat.....hence Bharat can be called creation only from role point of view.....in above Murli points it has been clearly mentioned CREATOR and CREATION should be in corporeal form.... incorporeal world and the same stuff has nothing to do with these....