shivsena wrote:If Brahma has not become karmatit, then how can he have a subtle body to go to mt. abu in the first place to narrate Vanis ???
Until every human soul returns to the Supreme Abode it will have a subtle body in this world.
If Brahma was baby-buddhi and could not understand Murlis then how does he narrate perfect avaykt Vanis after 2-3 days of his leaving the previous body in 1969; he had no sanskars of Gyan in him as Dada Lekhraj.
He narrates just dharna points and not the knowledge of world cycle.
If Brahma is entering in Veerendra Dev Dixit in seed stage, then where is the need for him to study RajYoga.
He does not enter Baba Dixit in a seed stage, but attains some seed stage due to the effect of his company. So, until he attains the complete seed-stage he will continue to study rajyog.
What he learns in Ram's body and what he narrates in Vanis are very different from each other; How come he does not teach ''Sakar mein nirakar ko Yaad karo'' in Vanis.
He does not teach everything that he learns through the body of Baba Dixit, but whatever he teaches is not in contradiction of the advanced knowledge.
How come supreme teacher Shiva is reading the same Vanis of Brahma(student) and explaining the meaning of student's Vanis and not his own Murli statements(many important gems in Murlis still remain unanswered even after 20 years)
How can you say that it is Dada Lekhraj's Vani, when he himself never claims so? I and some PBKs are trying to give advance knowledge through this forum. Does it mean that we have invented advance knowledge? The giver of knowledge is only one and that is Shiv.