Shiv through Shankar
Welcome back BKdimok.BKdimok wrote:All this time I was doing Bhakti-Yoga in a Hare Krishna Temple. So there is a lot of experience on this topic. Questions are most welcome.
Are you now part of the Hare Krishna movement or still a BK? What do you mean Shiv through Shankar?
Last time you was on the forum, you were preparing to go to Madhuban, how did that go?
OK, I must have got you confused with someone else who said there were going to Madhuban last november/december sorry.BKdimok wrote:Om Shanti, John. I said, that will meet you in Madhuban but did not said when.
Shiv through Shankar means, that Shiva speaks through His Chariot, Shankar.
Then who is the Chariot Shankar?
OK, I found this post dated 15th Oct 2006Om Shanti. My service on this forum ended. I wish you all to become deities. Also I wish you to meet Me in december in Madhuban. All you need to get there is strong will and printed copy of this post. It will be your passport. So you may start to pack your luggage. Also you need to remember Me, your Father, Point of Light. So come and see Me. If there is will then there is guarantee. Achcha.
ShivBaba through Shankar, also known as BK Dmitry.
- abrahma kumar
- Friends and family of
- Posts: 1133
- Joined: 23 Jun 2006
- Affinity to the BKWSU: ex-BK
- Contact:
John Bhai, aint you caught on yet to the name game?
John Bhai, why be one or the other when you can combine the 2 and so hope to be eventually accorded elevated status - in your own mind at least - within the BK corporate family structure aka BK gathering. That's not Bhaktijohn wrote:So, are you Shiv or Shankar?
Dear BKdimokBKdimok wrote:Dear souls. You know Trimurti. I was playing the role of Brahma through Brahma Baba, the role of Vishnu through Gulzars body and now I am also playing the role of Shankar through that young body.
You do realise there are lots of forum members with a vaster knowledge of Murli than yourself. Please reconsider your current tact before you make yourself look extremely foolish.
- arjun
- PBK
- Posts: 12201
- Joined: 01 May 2006
- Affinity to the BKWSU: PBK
- Please give a short description of your interest in joining this forum.: To exchange views with past and present members of BKWSU and its splinter groups.
- Location: India
Dear BKdimok,BKdimok wrote:Dear souls. You know Trimurti. I was playing the role of Brahma through Brahma Baba, the role of Vishnu through Gulzars body and now I am also playing the role of Shankar through that young body.
Om Shanti. But ShivBaba says in the Murlis that the sequence of events that you have mentioned above is wrong. It should be Brahma first, then Shankar and then Vishnu, because once Vishnu gets revealed, there is no need for Shiv to continue giving knowledge. Revelation of Vishnu means establishment of heaven, Vaikunth. So, where is the heaven now?
By the way, are you referring to BK Gulzar Dadiji as the 'young body' through which you are performing the role of Shankar? And what about your own body, the body of BKdimok or BKDmitry (as John Bhai has found out)?
Regards,
OGS,
Arjun
- abrahma kumar
- Friends and family of
- Posts: 1133
- Joined: 23 Jun 2006
- Affinity to the BKWSU: ex-BK
- Contact:
Arjun, you can not be serious, man! :Parjun wrote:Om Shanti. But ShivBaba says in the Murlis that the sequence of events that you have mentioned above is wrong. It should be Brahma first, then Shankar and then Vishnu, because once Vishnu gets revealed, there is no need for Shiv to continue giving knowledge. Revelation of Vishnu means establishment of heaven, Vaikunth. So, where is the heaven now? By the way, are you referring to BK Gulzar Dadiji as the 'young body' through which you are performing the role of Shankar? And what about your own body, the body of BKdimok or BKDmitry (as John Bhai has found out)?
-
- Reforming BK
- Posts: 292
- Joined: 27 Aug 2006
- Affinity to the BKWSU: ex-BK
- Location: Russia, ICQ 261034552
- Contact:
Dear soul, Om Shanti. I did not say in the Murlis that the sequence of events I've mentioned above is wrong. I told you through Murlis about one meaning of Trimurti. I establish Heaven through Brahma, then destroy old world through Shankar and then sustain new world through Vishnu (combined form of Lakshmi & Narayan). Vishnu is the symbol. But also Trimurti relates to BKWSU.arjun wrote:By the way, are you referring to BK Gulzar Dadiji as the 'young body' through which you are performing the role of Shankar? And what about your own body, the body of BKdimok or BKDmitry (as John Bhai has found out)?
I create BK through Brahma Baba (Brahma), sustain them through Dadi Gulzar's body by Brahma Baba's thin body (Vishnu) and now I will destroy all this dirty stuff you are discussing here through this young body of BK Dmitry (Shankar).
Vaikunth is not Heaven, it is the place where you are in your soul form. There is only shanti there. Heaven is caled Vaikunth on Earth. There is no Heaven yet.
Shiv through Shankar
- fluffy bunny
- ex-BKWSU
- Posts: 5365
- Joined: 07 Apr 2006
- Affinity to the BKWSU: ex-BK
- Please give a short description of your interest in joining this forum.: ex-BK. Interested in historical revisionism, failed predictions and abuse within the BK movement.
My God ... it is God Shiva himself posting on the forum. We don't need to bother asking Sister Jayanti any more.BKdimok wrote:I did not say in the Murlis that the sequence of events I've mentioned above is wrong ... now I will destroy all this dirty stuff you are discussing here through this young body of BK Dmitry (Shankar).
OK. While you are here, would you mind clarifying a few problems we have discovered in the history of the Yagya?
How old was Lekhraj Kirpalani when you entered him and why was there no mention of Shiva in the publications until at least after 1949? Are you also working through Virendra Dev Dixit?
-
- Reforming BK
- Posts: 292
- Joined: 27 Aug 2006
- Affinity to the BKWSU: ex-BK
- Location: Russia, ICQ 261034552
- Contact:
Dear soul, Om Shanti. There will be no comments about past of the Yagya. I started to play this role in oder to clean up all this dirty, which appeared in the Yagja. I don't enter in Virendra Dev Dixit. I'll meet him this year.ex-l wrote:How old was Lekhraj Kirpalani when you entered him and why was there no mention of Shiva in the publications until at least after 1949? Are you also working through Veerendra Dev Dixit?
Shiv through Shankar.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests