Zorba the Greek wrote: ↑06 Jun 2021 Versions of PrajaPita Brahma Baba 16.03.2020
(through Divine Sister Devki)
Question: It has been said in the Murli, ‘It is NOT the Law (for ShivBaba) to come into the body of a Pure Kumari’ – so how did (Shiv) Baba take the body of Dadi Gulzar, and this third Chariot (Sister Devki) of a Kumari?
Answer: It was said CORRECTLY. When our Loving (Shiv) Baba FIRST comes from the Supreme Abode and incarnates into this world in the very beginning (of Confluence Age), He CANNOT take the body of a Kumari – this is NOT the Law! Since (Shiv) Baba comes to establish a house-hold ashram - that is, a Pure house-hold Religion – therefore, (Shiv) Baba FIRST of ALL takes the (very) FIRST body of an elderly, experienced, impure house-holder (impure body of Dada Lekhraj – who is the SAME soul of Shri Krishna of the very beginning of Golden Age). He CANNOT take the body of a Kumari (the VERY FIRST time, when He FIRST incarnates)! This is why it was said in the Murli that ONLY the body of Brahma (soul of Dada Lekhraj) is FIXED (as the APPOINTED Chariot of ShivBaba) – the body of ANY Kumari is NOT fixed (for SUCH incarnation - for the VERY FIRST time). There is the praise of this, that ‘the world was created through Brahma’ – it CANNOT be said that ‘the world was created through a Kumari’. This is why (Shiv) Baba, FIRST of ALL, takes an elderly, experienced body of a house-holder – there is NO praise of ANY youth (young person – with regard to this aspect).
Then they ask how He (Shiv Baba) took the body of the child Shobha, that is Dadi Gulzar (her ‘lokik’ name was ‘Shobha’), since she too was a Kumari!
It is ALSO necessary to take the body of a Kumari (female), because the Father (Shiv Baba) gives EQUAL status to a male and a female (since the soul is neither EXCLUSIVELY male or female – and has BOTH sanskars within)! Otherwise, they would then say that EVEN God kept ONLY a man (male) in front (and NOT a woman, or female)! What about a woman (female)? This is why it is ALSO necessary to take the body of a Kumari (female). But He keeps an impure house-holder as His FIXED (APPOINTED) Chariot. The second body of Dadi Gulzar was NOT the FIRST body – it was the NEXT body. It was the SECOND body, and NOT the FIRST body. If He did not take the body of a Kumari (AFTER Brahma Baba became Avyakt, and left his corporeal body) then how could such a GREAT Heaven be established? If at THAT time – in the beginning (of Confluence Age) – He would have taken the body of a Kumari, then ONLY all the Kumaris would have come – and then they would say that ‘this Kumari, who is sitting and giving Knowledge, does not have to sustain children’! This is why there is the praise of ONLY an ELDERLY body (as Brahma) – there is NO praise of a young body (as Brahma)!
"(Dada Lekhraj – who is the SAME soul of Shri Krishna of the very beginning of Golden Age)."
Point number one - Krishna is NOT the God of Gita (this is the major difference between Bhakti Marg vs path of knowledge).
Dada Lekhraj is NOT the God of Gita for sure, and he is not the mukarar rath!