6) Again just lie. Murli does not say that ShivBaba takes many births. You may say- "the PBK interpretation is so and so". .
So bhi ek janma kee nahee. ShivBaba ke kitney janmon kee biography hai? Tumko maaloom hai?
6) Again just lie. Murli does not say that ShivBaba takes many births. You may say- "the PBK interpretation is so and so". .
So bhi ek janma kee nahee. ShivBaba ke kitney janmon kee biography hai? Tumko maaloom hai?
Everyone knows the biography. Biography - jivan kahani. Story of the life. Means one must be living, living means in a body, a soul becomes living in a body. And that also not of one birth. Here the word birth is used. Not one birth. If not one then how many. More than one. Is there a third option that it is not one and not many and still it is birth and still it is story of the life?Sab jaantey hain Parmatma kee jeevan kahani. So bhi ek janma kee nahee.
That is fine. The bakti performed in 63 births becomes basis for the knowledge we get in Sangamyug, but what is the role there of God in people doing bhaki? People are doing Bhakti based on their own mind, that is why it is called path of degradation.7) There is benefit. Baba says- 21 janmon kaa praalabhd ka aadhaar hai 63 janmon kee Bhakti. Unless one does Bhakti, he cannot get gyaan.
No, the word automatic is not used. It is indeed said that I give vision. But is there a biography and birth in this giving visions?Where is is said- AUTOMATIC or MANY BIRTHs?
12) Baba has not said - just one birth. Baba has said "one birth, plus Bhaktimarg part of giving visions, etc. (in the adjacent sentences) ".sita wrote:Everyone knows the biography. Biography - jivan kahani. Story of the life. Means one must be living, living means in a body,a soul becomes living in a body. And that also not of one birth.Here the word birth is used. Not one birth. If not one then how many. More than one. Is there a third option that it is not one and not many and still it is birth and still it is story of the life?
What about the words "birth", "births". "Not just one birth." "How many births"? Is it that for a birth also living and a body is not needed?13) Meaning of biography need not be always in living body. It can also mean PART. Baba does not or need not speak literally. There are many such examples, already given to you. in the topic - Flaws in PBK philosophy. Type for rejuvenation in the topic and see.
So, you say it means his coming in Sangamyug + his role after the Copper Age. This is the meaning of not just one birth?That too, not just of one birth. The biography of ShivBaba’s how many births is available?
Some of your explanations to me seem like condemnation and judgement.which is SELF-EXPLANATORY
That is true to some limit. We are all bound to perceive through our own personal lens of past experiences and sanskars, attitude, perceptions and dispositions etc., but still there will be twist to some limit. We cannot interpret a reality just as we wish. If I perceive something there is also a good chance for it to be a reality. That is why it is good that someone else also shares his impressions, or double check. To me your posts are very condemning and judgmental, you say the problem is with me. This is possible, but you also have to think a bit. Maybe there is some truth in what I say too.APPEARANCES can be DECEPTIVE, and are ALWAYS governed by the COLOURED PERCEPTIONS of the observer!
WONDERFUL DRAMA!
PBKs claim their Confluence Age Narayan is the only intelligent one. All the rest of the Narayans of Golden Age are fools. And, PBKs claim their Confluence Age Narayan took birth in 1976.sita wrote:In the Murli it is said that when the rust from the soul is removed, ...
Where has he certified it?but Mr. Dixit had (inadvertently) certified it!
Mr. Dixit has used it, means he has INADVERTENTLY certified it.sita wrote:Where has he certified it?
Please, present some evidence where he has used it.Mr. Dixit has used it
There is difference between the spiritual and worldy knowledge. When Avyakt BapDada asks about the service of the children is he taking knowledge from them. There is nothing wrong in studying the history of the Yagya from worldly sources for to know it in a worldly way. There is no other way to obtain such information. It won't come to us in meditation.Mostly, it is Mr. Dixit who has first taken that name from the BK comic book. So- it is as good as Mr. Dixit took teachings from BKs as well - (it again proves that Mr. Dixit has no ability to do churning from the Murli points), he fell into the pit by taking the support/teaching of BK comic book.
So- from all dimensions/ways, the so-called PBK intelligent Narayan proved that his intellect is the most foolish one, as well as he took teachings from others (not just churned from Murli points).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests