It was not complaining. It was pointing the facts that the PBK souls - who claim themselves to be gyaani tu atmas do not have that capacity to churn individually.
It is the PBKs who say- we are gyaani tu atmas, and at the same time say- no one except the Chariot has right to give directions*. But, they even violate their own stands and give their own personal interpretations.
* - Flaw No. 262 - viewtopic.php?f=39&t=2099&p=51585&hilit=mash_hur#p51585
So- again I am not complaining. I am just showing that PBKs fall into their own traps/claims. Also- their double standards- they claim one should listen only to the ShivBaba, and give their own COUNTLESS interpretations, and claim that is not a violation of srimath. But, if BKs give their own directions, it becomes a manmath! -
We/BKs believe (or even the Murli points logically imply)- it will be numberwise. Of course, some may be mistakes/manmath too, but not all.
When all the PBK personailities failed in 1942, 1947, 1983, 1998, even Mr. Dixit failed to realize many simplest typing errors in Murlis, that is not at all a violation of srimath! and is FULLY ACCEPTABLE by the so-called PBKs.
It is you who is having double standards. First you accuse us we don't churn, then you accuse us we churn.
What is wrong in churning and giving interpretations as long as they are along with the knowledge. But the fact is that mostly everything I share here is what I have learned from the advanced knowledge. It is only because you have not heard these points that you think they are mine.
We/BKs believe (or even the Murli points logically imply)- it will be numberwise. Of course, some may be mistakes/manmath too, but not all.
The problem is that if you come with some interpretation there is no way to check and verify it if it is true. There is no authority we can turn to that we both accept. So it is only left to your stuburness to claim that what you say is true. Whist for the PBKs there is a way to check and verify whatever they say and if they are proved wrong they readily admit.
With regards drishti and shirmat we accept that it refers to one. When it is said about Brahma (the point in the link) then certainly his words will be Shrimat as whatever emerges through Brahma we should always consider it is ShivBaba speaking. But the definition of shrima is ekmat - direction of one.
Regarding the point about retirement, when many children are created through Brahma that he retires, it is because among the children such children will emerge who will become worthy to run this shop like world. And you have agreed that in that there will be one master and many helpers. It is also a kingdom that is being established so kind and queen will be running the family and there will be other positions like officers and also different types of subjects, maids, servants etc. In this establishment the king and queen were revealed in 1976.