shivsena wrote:In Sangamyug the impersonal God is called Shiva(supreme pure consciousness) which is called Brahman-the formless God in Bhakti.
OK, I can see the logic and am comfortable enough with that ... it is like "as in the beginning, so at the end", and would mean a lot more dead wood be cut out of the BK tree.
Of course, I cannot say "I know that" until I do.
That would mean Virendra Dev Dixit is playing the role of some kind of agent provocateur, false flag or catalyst showing the BKWSU what they are doing by putting up a mirror image for them to look at it. A mirror image but with some improvements and developments to prick their consciousness and anger them.
Of course, the BKs do not like what they see in the mirror and so want to destroy the mirror rather than removing the ugliness/inconsistencies/errors/weakness within themselves. Virendra Dev Dixit is a teacher, but the BKs are completely failing to appreciation the lesson they are beginning given, and have an interest only as so far as they can steal items of value (understanding) from him and sell them down to their followers.
And too they are doing the same with brahmakumaris.info.
BKs do not care about Gyan...they have only monetary interests....while Veerendra Dev Dixit as ishwariya Maya will have to bow down(surrender) in front of 108 (as per Vanis)...and all along he is quite aware of his part, while the PBKs are being taken for a ride..
They don't care about ethics either, they are not even very spiritual. The leaders are experts in sustaining a spiritual facade, playing the role of a "holy person" with their own brand of Bhakti (... "
cash registers and Baba boxes are on you way out as you exit the building").
Well, let's not be too cruel towards them to say, "taken for a ride". Surely they are playing their role as Ram's army (general metaphor meant only, I don't know AK interpretations).