This is the latest version of the BKWSU version of the history. It mentions Pushpa as Piyu and the Piyu Vanis.
BKWSU wrote:Brahma Baba though, believes in the distinct personality of Piyu. However, that does little to convince others.
- As usually, it is very clearly factually and assumptively wrong in important places. Their vision or fantasy may be becoming clearer but only due to the pressure of outside influences. In my opinion, they still struggle to keep to manage the release of information to protect their own political positions within the Yugya.
BKWSU wrote:1943 During this period Brahma Baba relies heavily on a series of trance messengers to facilitate his own understanding and churning. Knowledge is still clearly Manmanabhav (let your mind be with God) Madhiajibhaw, ie Aham Brahma Asmi or Aham Chaturbhuj (I am the creator of creation/Vishnu/God).
Remind me, which are the original years of the oft mentioned "5 year Murli Cycle", it is the 5 years before 1969? I understand that you are placing emphasis on the years from 1965 to 1969. It would be interesting to study the change in personality of these and such theories would explain the great change in personality after 1969.shivsena wrote:... and after 1965 when Mama became farishta, then the whole subtle Sangamyugi drama became clear to her and that is what she describes in Sakar Murlis of 3 1/2 years through DLR ... when Mama came during-Lekhraj Kirpalani's class, then he used to stop giving Gyan and would say that now Mama will take the class.
Thank you for saying that. Yes, indeed.a complex riddle.....the whole mystery about who was narrating Gyan before 1965 will be clear only as the revelation time draws near and the senior Dadis who were with Mama reveal what really happened in the beginning of the Yagya.
We have heard talk of the Piyu Vanis, a so called "Golden Circle", perhaps some involvement of Janki Kripalani's sister, and a group who were involved but left. Who is going to be brave enough to spill the beans?
My feeling is that Janki Kripalani's ego/denial/attachment whatever is the primary obstacle ... and that people are either enthralled or afraid of her ... and the merchants within the Yugya value her profitableness to risk upsetting her.
My speculation ... and I emphasise this is *purely* my feeling and speculation ... is that her number one attachment is to Lekhraj Kirpalani and given than she was not his number one and did not have as much access to him as others hand in the early days, she is still hanging onto him and receiving his boons; and consequently the entire Yugya under her influence (mainly the West) has been skewed towards Lekhraj Kirpalani Bhakti clouding the truth.
Again, I write thing not on the basis of knowing Advance Knowledge but purely my own observations and experience. In the early days of the Yugya in the West under her, centers-in-charge were taught to encourage students that Lekhraj Kirpalani's versions were God's versions, or should be taken unquestionably as God's instructions. She was the one who, against Shrimat, demanded and instituted the trance lights. I remember her specifically pumping out large pictures of Lekhraj Kirpalani to each and every student, even placing him between couples that were in Gyan. "My Baba" she used to call him, like a cute little girl. She obviously felt second or third class to Om Radhe, and with her removal, Janki was ... perhaps ... able to have him for herself for the first time.
The impression I get from the likes of Jayanti, who is perfectly aware of all the revelations that are going on, is that she is afraid or unwilling to rock the boat because, naturally, Janki's throne will fall to her next. She rather manipulatively says the reason for not speaking up or out or question is due to "showing respect" for the elders. I guess she is playing the consummate politician and waiting until Janki dies and her position within the BKWSU Kingdom is secured until making any changes.
Will we have to wait until them for the revelation, or will the revelations come from outside their control?