sita wrote:I think Arjun has rightly assumed there is some closer person to you who is involved and that's why you take it so personal, but instead of getting involving in useless fight, will it not be better if you leave the freedom of everyone to do whatever they wish.
is not Satya the same one as Sanjeev who was banned from the ex-BK forum because he was always arguing with the PBKs? I forget. There are so many crazy ex-PBKs and they all sounds the same ... like the Vishnu Party people.
did not Satya/Sanjeev think *HE* was the authentic Chariot for a while?
Unfortunately, things like religion, and the internet, are addictive for crazy people who project their problems onto something ... could be *anything* ... and become stuck on it going round and round and round. Going nowhere. Not only do they just like to fight ... sub-consciously they are programmed to lose. They pick fights they cannot win so they lose and then they feel hurt.
I think in psychology it is called "narcissistic wounding". It is similar to you young boys who pretend to be hurt so their mother comes and blows on their wound or kisses them better. Actually, all they want in love but they don't know how to get it, so like young children they have a tantrum.
As an English speaker, I have no problem with god of the BKWSU speaking in Hindi only. Virendra Dev Dixit/PBKs are really only a sub-set of Brahma Kumarism. He and they have to operate within the limits of Brahma Kumarism in order to appear authentic. The PBK argument is that they are the more authentic tradition of BK-ism and they are being more authentic to the BK tradition. I agree with that bit ... even though I do not accept the bigger picture.
Brahma Kumarism is full of unresolved contradictions and unethical manipulations. I understand that Virendra Dev Dixit/PBKs are just trying resolve all the contradictions as best they can whereas the BKs are just lie, twist and trying to bury them.
As long as the PBKs don't hurt people, I have to acknowledge their right to their own religion. I presume they learn something from it and they teach the BKs something too. I agree with them that the BKs are at a more basic level, that most of the philosophy reflects on their own movement rather than the rest of the world, and that some of the BKs are quite "devilish".
Why only Hindi? Because at best it is just Lekhraj Kirpalani or Dadi Gulzar speaking, and that the only language they speak. I am sorry but I think Lekhraj Kirpalani made such a mess of the philosophy everyone else has been confused by it ... and then the clueless, ignorant, arrogant hateful BK leaders have made an even bigger mess of it.