There is nothing wrong to have the desire to be in the rosary of 108 but one should have the regal mentality to face all types of challenges eventhough it can be unfavourable.shivsena wrote:
May i know what is wrong if i have the desire to be in 108 and if i am making efforts to achieve my goal and if i have openly expressed that desire on this forum.
Dear sachkhand Bhai,indiana wrote
When Baba Dixit said that you will do glani when you were in the same room with him, Baba Dixit could foresee your future role when you leave him. Hasn't it become true to his words that now you are denigrating him to your utmost level.
sachkhand wrote
That might be true.
There is nothing wrong in desiring to be in 108, but that should not be at the cost of denigrating others, that too constantly. There is a limit to anybody's capacity to read constant negative comments.shivsena wrote:May i know what is wrong if i have the desire to be in 108 and if i am making efforts to achieve my goal and if i have openly expressed that desire on this forum.
Dear Arjun,arjun wrote:(on 13 may 2009) I don't know whether it is your ego or your ignorance which makes you keep repeating such statements. But it definitely is a demoralizing statement for those who are sincerely making efforts despite the vicious atmosphere of the world. ...
If you start telling every patient that you have no chance survival unless a miracle takes place in future, then even a patient who may have chances of recovery would die prematurely. This is what you are doing to all the spiritual effortmakers by your constant negative propaganda about the BK and PBK knowledge.
(on 14 may 2009) ...as a spiritual doctor (as Baba calls His children) you do just the opposite by hammering PBKs and BKs day and night that The Knowledge that they are following is completely false...
Shivsena wrote that he fully agrees with you in this issue. To this you replied,arjun wrote: (on 13 may 2009) No, it does not mean that just because some sentences are in direct speech, they have been spoken by ShivBaba in direct speech. They are definitely preceded somewhere by indirect speech, like 'the Father says' , 'Baba says' etc. So, on the whole the entire Murli is in an indirect speech.
So, sorry, I am not with you on this issue. :sad:
Dear Arjun, are you (and Shivsena) not questioning the basis of Rudra Gyaan Yagnya? i.e., the Murlis. Is it proper. If it is proper, then there is no wrong in questioning anything and anyone with regard to ShivBaba's knowledge.arjun wrote: (on 13 may 2009) Thank God you agree with us at least on one point. :D
Dear Andrey,andrey wrote:Dear Brother sachkhand,
You seem to know arjun Bhai very well.
Dear Arjun,arjun wrote:I never said that I have become perfect. Nor am I in the race to become a bead of the rosary of 108 just like shivsena Bhai. I am just an ordinary effortmaker and have accepted my shortcomings on this forum and the previous forums many times.
In the Murlis Baba has given every Godly student the aim to get transformed from a man to Narayan and from a woman to Lakshmi. And it applies to me as well. :Dsachkhand wrote:You should have confidence in accepting our goal. If you are afraid just to say openly about your aim and object, then how will you acheive it.
Dear indiana,pbkindiana wrote:Dear sachkhand Bhai,
I salute your sincerity.
dear sachkhand Bhai,sachkhand wrote:
Is the above complement a real complement or is it for making joke of me. I wanted to know your actual intention because these words have made me to churn lots of points and has given me special experience. If you do not want to write it openly that it was a joke or that it was real appreciation, then please write me personal message. But please write what is truth, what was your actual intention. I need it to draw conclusion to my experience.
Thanks.
Sanjeev
I think you wanted to write about shivsena Bhai but have taken my name by mistake.sachkhand wrote:How did you conclude so. I have just phoned him twice or thrice. And when I wrote about my banning, I had received email from him to my email address. I had recently emailed him because he had said in one of the thread that he will write to me about Krishna's soul misleading PBKs and had not written to me.That's all.
I have still not met him.But surely I am interested in meeting him, if possible.
AUM Shanti.arjun wrote:I think you wanted to write about shivsena Bhai but have taken my name by mistake.
I wish to clarify that I have not received any phone call or email from you ever since you rejoined this forum.
AUM Shanti.andrey wrote:Dear Brother sachkhand,
If you don't know someone how will he take your words commenting his character. Even if you know someone closely such words are not to be spoken. You should apologize immediately, to both arjun Bhai and PBK indiana.
What bigger challenge can anyone dare and face, when i am openly challenging and proclaiming repeatedly that advance knowledge is Krishna ki jhooti Gita, which is responsible for the downfall of the pbk family and only those who have the courage and guts to prove this fact through Murli and Vani points will come in final 108.pbkindiana wrote:
There is nothing wrong to have the desire to be in the rosary of 108 but one should have the regal mentality to face all types of challenges eventhough it can be unfavourable.
Om Shanti -- indie
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests