ShivBaba often speaks of the titleholder Indian kings during the British rule who used to pay huge amounts to the British rulers to get titles.shivsena wrote:Again this ''titleholder" word is used only in Advanced Knowledge and never in Murlis.
He speaks about both. It is for us to decide whether we wish to become Lakshmi-Narayan like deties in this birth or in the next birth.Also i do not see why Shiva should talk about titleholders of Satyug and not the original Lakshmi-Narayan which are revealed in front of 600 crore souls.
How can you say that she is less knowledgeable than Mama Saraswati?How can the head of vijaymala be Lakshmi when she is less knowledgeable than Mama Saraswati and mummy kamla devi ???? and she has never taken any responsibility of the Yagya.
Is she not serving an entire continent since many years? And how can you say that she will not take up a bigger responsibility in future? Is the Copper Age already over?
I agree, butThe word Sangamyugi has never never been prefixed in front of either Krishna or Narayan.
I have definitely seen this word in Sakar Murlis and if I find it I will quote.Can you please show me one Murli where the word ''Sangamyugi'' is ever mentioned in Murlis anytime for any personality.
It is not Baba Dixit who teaches us but ShivBaba. And ShivBaba has Himself mentioned about the Confluence-Aged LN and Golden Aged L-N by telling that 'these L-N are very clever' and 'these L-N are fools' respectively in the Murlis.I think you mean to say that Baba Dixit has taught to differentiate between the two, because Shiva would never say one thing in Murlis and teach something else in his clarifications. ( which again means that Advanced Knowledge is Krishna ki jhooti Gita, contradicting all Murli points)
