BK-PBK.Info - for BKs & PBKs or BKWSU & AIVV Supporters, Children, Students & Disciples

Thanks sister Aimee. Your views are slightly different from traditional PBKism. Thanks. You feel bad when PBKs are criticised. But you saw through the eyes of BKs & you realised the pain of them, when they are BADLY criticised by PBKs.

Brother John, you are right. All and all Advance Literature & web-sites of the AIVV are 'full of' BK criticism. 24 hours a day, PBKs are engaged in criticising BKs. Is this fair, sister Aimee ...? * PBKs considers themselves as full cast Brahmins/Suryavanshi & BKs as half-cast Brahmins/Shudr...

Andreybhai, then you mean that Jagdamba is not a particular soul, but a common name of anyone who plays that type of role?

Then there may be so many Jagdambas & so many moons. Is your thought in according to advance knowledge? Then how many moon dynasties are there?

Thanks bro ex-l. Brahma instead of corporeal part how can be called as a moon of the basic world? - as the basic world is also corporeal today.

Respected & senior bro ex-l, please explain in details what you want to say. You are the Master on Yagya history. What's your views about Brahma's role after 1969? What is Avyakt stage? Is a ghost Avyakt?

Andreybhay, you again repeated the same reply changing the wordings. Now you are write. Lekhraj Brahma plays the role of Jagdamba & not Kamla. And to be Jagdamba, Brahma (Lekhraj) must be corporeal part-holder even after 1969.

I STRONGLY ARGUE THAT BRAHMA HAS NOT ACHIEVED Avyakt STAGE.

Thanks Arjunbhai. Your selection of Q&A is knowledgeable.

But dear Arjunbhai, Bharatmata is head of Vijaymala & the mother of Krishna (according to PBKs). So her role is superior to that of Lekhraj Brahma (according to PBKs). Then she must be a moon. Is she a minor star of knowledge...? Again, the base world, today is in corporeal condition. And they a...

Yes, Andreybhai, now you are on the very right track, though this point of view is against to that of Arjunbhai & Botton Slammer. The concept of 'Lekhraj Brahma' as the moon of base world & Jagdamba (Kamla?) as the moon of the seed-like world' has no Murli proof. In the night of Brahma we re...

Dear Arjunbhai, here again you stated that Lekhraj Brahma & Jagdamba are 2 moons. But what about Bharatmata? is not she the moon? If she is a moon, then of which world?

Dear Andreybhai, I've already quoted the Murli point (with date) in an previous reply of this thread, which states that Krishna will be Narayan at the age of 20-25.

Respected Sir, mr green, if you don't mind, can I interfere? The Murli statements which describe Bharat as the most degraded country, are correct & you are also correct. Consider two persons; 'A' who has 25,000 dollars & 'B' who has 10,000 dollars. Now suppose that A has lost 15,000 dollars ...

No logic. Total lack of commonsense. Andrey Bhai, is your reply in accordance with advance knowledge? If the Father of humanity is not the sun, then what is he? - The moon? Or the river? Or the pond of knowledge?

Andrey Bhai, I am not a mathematician. But this does not mean that WITHOUT Murli PROOF, I should have to accept that Krishna gets coronated in the age of 18.

Andrey Bhai, so you think that my dear than the dearest Baba Virendra Dev Dixit is not the Sun of Knowledge! Then his position becomes inferior to that of the Sun. Then logically we HAVE TO accept that Virendra Dev Dixit is a Moon of Knowledge. Now the total number of Moons of Knowledge becomes 4 as...