Search found 309 matches

by ANU
13 May 2012
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Need help to understand teachings of PBK
Replies: 44
Views: 28395

Re: Bathing after using the toilet

Frieds Travel through India and watch people - deseases, dirt, deadly smelly householdes and environement, feacal flowing in the streets and people urinating in the strees ---- see what the society does. Yet, BKs and PBKs who preach saving water and other resources prefers to use bath and wash cloth...
by ANU
13 May 2012
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: AK crazy story about peacock
Replies: 160
Views: 150828

Re: AK crazy story about peacock

Guys I started the topic about AIVV lies about the peacock procreation, you turned the topic into ... never mind. cannot you stick to the topic and discuss the main story? AIVV teaches that the peacock procreates in a pure way throu tears! cannot you see, after watching the film, that it is bullsh**...
by ANU
13 May 2012
Forum: Factual Yagya History: BK and PBK versions
Topic: BK Shivani on the foundations of BKWSU history
Replies: 4
Views: 9522

Re: BK Shivani on the foundations of BKWSU history

Dear Shivsena Do not use the term hypothesis for that what do PBKs. A hypothesis always contain words "maybe", "probably" etc and is bound to only a speculation to be destroyed. A good scientist respecting the code of science will confirm that a hypothesis remains to be falsified...
by ANU
13 May 2012
Forum: Factual Yagya History: BK and PBK versions
Topic: Unraveling the history of Lekhraj Kripalani's partner
Replies: 35
Views: 35127

Re: The PBK prediction that did not come to pass

I kindly ask anybody who can provide me any proof that any of the PBKs predictions till now has come true, to send them here: 1998 the end of giving inheritance to the world 2007 reunion of BK and PBK 2008 Jagadamba coming back to PBKs not to mention about dozens of others. Harsh criticism that PBKs...
by ANU
03 Jun 2011
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Forum changes
Replies: 169
Views: 130935

Re: Forum changes

In my opinion this forum has become similar to a bazaar or an exhibition of barking dogs. It goes to nowhere, I do not wish to participate in it anymore. This is a never ending game of arguments and contrarguments, sometimes or often in nasty styles in my opinion breaking basic rules of view exchang...
by ANU
31 May 2011
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Forum changes
Replies: 169
Views: 130935

Re: Forum changes

" शिवबाबा नाम शरीर पर पडता है।" मु. 24.3.01 "The name ShivBaba is based on the body." - Mu.24.3.01 Thank you. I did not mean this point. I heard many times in classes and also in my batti course a different point, saying that Shiva plus body is ShivBaba. I have never come across...
by ANU
31 May 2011
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Forum changes
Replies: 169
Views: 130935

Re: Forum changes

I don't support this proposal. If someone is questioning Advanced Knowledge, those who support it should be allowed to present their views as well. Otherwise, it would be a one-sided affair. Then why those who question AK were expelled from the section of AK? is not it one sided? If those who suppo...
by ANU
31 May 2011
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Forum changes
Replies: 169
Views: 130935

Re: Forum changes

As far as I remember I have posted that Murli point on this forum after obtaining the same from Baba. But it is difficult to search. If I find it I will definitely post it once again. Thank you. I find it strange that such an important Murli point was narrated only once (or so rarely). I have never...
by ANU
30 May 2011
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Forum changes
Replies: 169
Views: 130935

Re: Forum changes

ANU is another one who called ShivBaba( Veerendra Dev Dixit) openly as a liar. Warrior, start thinking not repeating bleatings. Or start reading carefully. I stated many times that Virendra Dev Dixit teaches untruth or lies, that AIVV spreads untruth or lies. Not ShivBaba. I don't know ShivBaba, mo...
by ANU
30 May 2011
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Forum changes
Replies: 169
Views: 130935

Re: Forum changes

Once again I ask the administrator to sort out the forum and to make clear distinction who is allowed to write in the section for "those who question AK". I my opinion only those who question AK should be allowed to post their views here. Funs, supporters and students of AK should remain i...
by ANU
30 May 2011
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Forum changes
Replies: 169
Views: 130935

Re: Forum changes

And I expect this dispute move from this section.
by ANU
30 May 2011
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Forum changes
Replies: 169
Views: 130935

Re: Forum changes

Also apply the same punishments to any members who violate the rules of this forum and not banning the PBKs only. indie. Am I to punish someone? Sorry, but you must have made a mistake. If you like to punish someone and feel you have right to do it, do it. I will watch it. I only speak for MYSELF a...
by ANU
30 May 2011
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Forum changes
Replies: 169
Views: 130935

Re: Forum changes

I do not wish to have the same portion of conflicts, "rascals", "idiots", pigs ears", "chicken out", "dogs dinners" and others [quotations] and heat in the new section. Make decision who is allowed in this section in a one-minded short sentence to make th...
by ANU
29 May 2011
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Forum changes
Replies: 169
Views: 130935

Re: Forum changes

However; i was thinking that this would work, by leaving the supporting section, simply for PBKs to discuss AK amongst themselves, as everyone appears to be suggesting... and that the questioning section, would be a "free for all" zone, where we can continue to do battle If the AK support...
by ANU
29 May 2011
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Forum changes
Replies: 169
Views: 130935

Re: Forum changes

After reading all what was written above, my opinion is that the section for those who question AK should be only for those who question it. If PBK supporters and PBK students want to express their opinions, let them express it in their section. Otherwise, I do not see any sense in this split. I saw...